This is a story about how two official assessments of the same person, using the same medical records, ten weeks apart, reached opposite conclusions. I'm sharing it because it says something about how the system works, not just for me, but for anyone who's been through something similar.

The First Assessment

I applied for recognition of my situation through the official process. The agency sent me to a specialist for a 25-minute appointment. She noted that I spoke well, seemed calm, and appeared to be managing. Her conclusion was that my situation wasn't severe enough to meet the threshold. One of the reasons: treatment options hadn't been exhausted yet.

The Second Assessment

Ten weeks later, a different agency assessed me for a different kind of support. A different doctor, but the same medical records, the same hospital files that had documented my treatment history over the past decade.

This time, the findings were different. Concentration was noted as reduced. Energy and motivation were noted as reduced. The hospital records she cited stated explicitly that treatment options had been exhausted. She concluded that I needed significant ongoing support, and that this need would very likely not go away.

The Gap

Two assessments. Same person. Same medical history. One said I was managing well enough. The other said I needed ongoing care. Both are official documents. Both are currently valid.

I don't know how to reconcile that. I don't think the system knows either.

The Bigger Picture

My residency application was also affected. The immigration authority looked at my university record and asked: if you could study, why can't you work? They acknowledged that my situation involves significant limitations (their words) but used my academic effort as evidence that those limitations shouldn't prevent employment.

One system said I was doing too well to need support. Another said I wasn't doing well enough to be self-sufficient. The university couldn't accommodate what I needed. Employers didn't respond to hundreds of applications.

Each system had its own logic. But when you put them together, the logic contradicts itself.

Why I'm Sharing This

I'm not sharing this to complain about any individual person or decision. I'm sharing it because I think the experience of falling between systems, where each one sees a different part of you and none of them see the whole, is something that many people go through but rarely have the documentation to show.

I have the documentation. And I think it's worth putting on the record.

← Back to all posts